Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hoe v. Dorchester County Detention Center and Officials
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Savon D. Hoe
Defendant:
Dorchester County Detention Center and Officials, Officer Dean Cobb, Lt. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Burns v. Wallace
as 4:2023cv04829
Petitioner:
Alan L. Burns
Respondent:
Warden Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burns v. Lewis et al
as 6:2023cv02073
Plaintiff:
Calvin Burns
Defendant:
Hobart Lewis, Mark Dulude and Mark Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Burns v. Beaufort County et al
as 9:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Burns
Defendant:
Beaufort County, Philip Foot, Quandara Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cartee v. McBride et al
as 8:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Reggie Wade Cartee
Defendant:
Chad McBride, Anderson County Sheriff's Office, Donna Marie Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Burns v. Anderson et al
as 0:2021cv04142
Plaintiff:
Jessica Nicole Burns
Defendant:
Major Anderson and Captain Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Burns v. Lott et al
as 3:2021cv03710
Plaintiff:
Ralph Burns
Defendant:
Sheriff Leon Lott and Melissa S. Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. County of Chesterfield et al
as 4:2021cv01989
Defendant:
Chesterfield County Sheriff, John Doe, Graig Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Burnes et al
as 2:2021cv01696
Defendant:
Eric McDaniel, Major Brown, William C Burnes and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Burns v. Humbug et al
as 4:2020cv03667
Plaintiff:
Octavious Bryan Burns
Defendant:
Sheriff Humbug and Chad Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
