Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barbour v. Burgin et al
as 7:2010cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Barbour
Defendant:
Lt. Burgin, Former Sgt. Collins, C/O Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Homo Sapiens Sapiens et al
as 7:2010cv00283
Defendant:
Attorney General Of Virginia, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, Gene Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Sanford et al
as 7:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Mr. Kensey, "Who They Where Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. East India Tarsier Standford et al
as 2:2010cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
East India Tarsier Standford, Byron Watson, Genen M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Rabies et al
as 7:2010cv00214
Defendant:
28 U.S.C. 1915(g) 2403, A. Rabies, Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Investigator McBribe and Byron Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Edward Barbour v. VA NGRI Law 2403 (b) may apply et al
as 7:2010cv00160
Defendant:
Austipithecus Robustus, VDOC's Director Gene M. Johnson, VA NGRI Law 2403 (b) may apply and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Staughbury et al
as 7:2010cv00149
:
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Ms. Staughbury and Byron Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Watson
as 1:2009cv00876
Petitioner:
Emmanuel King Shaw
Respondent:
Byron Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
