Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Harmon v. Whittenberger et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bryon Keith Harmon and Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
Haeli N. Whittenberger, Sgt Brenda R. Phillips, Assistant Warden Ariel Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Coleman et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
R. Coleman, Barbara Kent, Rachael Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Oppong et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
Christian Oppong, Jeremy W. Zwar, Kimberly A. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon El v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv00617
Petitioner:
Byron Keith Harmon El
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harmon v. Hanson et al
as 9:2019cv00041
Respondent:
Charlotte Mattox, Janice Hanson, Brandy Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Byron-Keith Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Hanson et al
as 4:2019cv00809
Defendant:
Charlotte Mattox, Kent Dickerson, Brandy Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Byron-Keith Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Harmon v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20126
Petitioner / Appellant:
BYRON KEITH HARMON
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Byron Harmon v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-20526
Petitioner - Appellant:
BYRON KEITH HARMON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Harmon v. Davis
as 4:2018cv02207
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harmon v. Director, TDCJ-CID ***TRANSFERRED TO SD/TX.***
as 1:2018cv00281
Petitioner:
Byron Keith Harmon
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
