Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BROOKS et al v. MON RIVER TOWING, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01580
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS C. BROOKS and KELCI L. BROOKS
Defendant:
MON RIVER TOWING, INC. , CONSOL ENERGY SALES COMPANY and CONSOL ENERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BROOKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56400
Plaintiff:
ANDREW C. BROOKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROOKS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37301
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. BROOKS, JR. , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROOKS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70545
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. BROOKS, JR.
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39054
Plaintiff:
WALLACE C. BROOKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BROOKS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv00658
Plaintiff:
JERRY C. BROOKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BROOKS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31394
Plaintiff:
ANDREW C. BROOKS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TATE v. KUBANEY et al
as 1:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
JASON TATE
Defendant:
KUBANEY, BOYD, SUPERINTENDENT D.0.C. BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv86855
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C. BROOKS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, ACANDS, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KRR, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2008cv03534
Plaintiff:
KRR, INC. and DAVID C. BROOKS, ESQUIRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ENCARNACION LOUKATOS, PHILADELPHIA MULTIFAMILY HUB OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
