Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Spearman #320836 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman #320836
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Richard D. Russell, Unknown Part(y)(ies) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, C. Deatsman, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, Unknown Briggs, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv12044
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
T Lindemuth, C Deatsman, Catherine S Bauman and others
Clark v. Lindenmuth et al
as 2:2012cv12043
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
T Lindenmuth, Briggs, Catherine S Bauman and others
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, C. Deatsman, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth, et al
as 2:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, Unknown Briggs, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
