Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States v. Leroy Tate
as 22-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Leroy C. Tate
Tate v. United Steel
as 21-30763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James C. Tate
Defendant / Appellee:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied International and Service Workers International Union Local 8363, More Properly Identified As
USA v. C. George
as 21-1117
Defendant / Appellant:
C. TATE GEORGE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Umphress v. Hall
as 20-11216
Defendant / Appellee:
Janis Holt, in their official capacity as a Member of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, David Schenck, in their official capacity as a Member of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Steve Fischer, in their official capacity as a Member of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian Keith Umphress
Appellee:
Clifton Roberson and Clifton Robinson
C. George v. USA
as 20-2523
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. TATE GEORGE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clarence Anderson v. Marty Boyd, et al
as 20-2101
Defendant / Appellee:
C Tate, K. Bowers, Administration, Craighead County Detention Center, C. Rains, Correctional Officer, Craighead County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clarence Anderson
C. George v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 20-1023
Petitioner / Appellant:
C. TATE GEORGE
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
In re: C. Tate George
as 20-1011
Not Yet Classified:
ANNE E. THOMPSON, In re: C. TATE GEORGE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: C. Tate George
as 19-1712
Not Yet Classified:
In re: C. TATE GEORGE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANNE E. THOMPSON
USA v. C. George
as 16-1170
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
C. TATE GEORGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
