Cases 1 - 10 of 1,286
Goodwin v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C. Goodwin
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Baker v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Baker
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Richie et al v. Epien Medical Inc.
as 0:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHANCE RICHIE AND AMANDA C. RICHIE, as Co-Trustees of the Richie Family Living Trust UAD
Defendant:
EPIEN MEDICAL INC., a Minnesota corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Price v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
James C. Price
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Thomas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
James C. Thomas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Stephens v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Christine C. Stephens
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Stark et al v. K&C Specialties Corp. et al
as 0:2024cv01762
Plaintiff:
Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Initiative, the, Jeff Stark, Nick Nowak and others
Defendant:
K&C Specialties Corp. and James Isaac Spinks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Albert C. Burgess, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
