Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Casey v. 1400 Northside Drive, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04517
Plaintiff:
Robert Casey
Defendant:
1400 Northside Drive, Inc. and C. B. Jones, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
LAWSON v. MARSHALL et al
as 5:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
AVION TRAMAINE LAWSON
Defendant:
J MARSHALL, C W SPOONER, T P STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. LEAVINS et al.
as 5:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
AVION TRAMAINE LAWSON
Defendant:
D LEAVINS, CORIZON HEALTH COMPANY, C E DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. 1715 Northside Drive, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04004
Defendant:
1715 Northside Drive, Inc., C. B. Jones, II, A-1 Entertainment, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Vickie Mayes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Dean v. 1715 Northside Drive, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03775
Defendant:
1715 Northside Drive, Inc., Carmen Popovitch, A-1 Entertainment, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Delbra L. Dean
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Branch v. 1715 Northside Drive, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00960
Counter Claimant:
1715 Northside Drive, Inc., Carmen Popovitch and A-1 Entertainment, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Ashlie L. Branch
Defendant:
C. B. Jones, II, C. B. Jones, Karen Caudle and others
Petitioner:
Dean R. Fuchs and Susan Kastan Murphey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Thompson et al v. 1725 Northside Drive, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00390
Plaintiff:
Brittany M. Thompson , Jennifer R. Hight , Katherine M. Bellows and others
Defendant:
1725 Northside Drive, Inc. , C. B. Jones and Karen Kirk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Buckley v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Buckley
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, L. Locke, James Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2011cv04523
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Buckley
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, L. Ornelas, L. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
