Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Joseph v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Joseph
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Internal Affairs and David Wade Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tenner v. Wilkie et al
as 2:2023cv05866
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tenner
Defendant:
Captain Wilkie, Jody Banks, Timothy Berrian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C. Mos-beyIn re: C. Mos-bey
as 22-2367
Petitioner:
In re: C. JOSEPH MOS-BEY
Respondent:
THE CORPORATE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Mos-Bey v. Shroeder et al
as 5:2022ct03184
Plaintiff:
C. Joseph Mos-Bey and Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Thomas D. Shroeder, John Brubaker, Joe L. Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bul v. Joseph et al
as 1:2022cv10385
Plaintiff:
David A Bul
Defendant:
Mr Kelly C Joseph, Rebecca and Logan Airport 2 Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Massey v. PNC Bank, National Association et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Matthew Massey
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association, Taylor Belleville CDJR, Inc. and Oliver C. Joseph, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Mosby v. Clarence DelForge, III
as 21-7490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY, a/k/a C. Joseph Mosbey
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARENCE JOE DELFORGE, III and ERIK A. HOOKS
Laffoon v. Joseph et al
as 6:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
William F. Laffoon
Defendant:
David C. Joseph and Ben Hilfiger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. The Corporate State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03254
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby and C. Joseph Mos-Bey
Defendant:
The Corporate State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laffoon v. Joseph
as 6:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
William F. Laffoon
Defendant:
Judge David C. Joseph and David C. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
