Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Anthony Robinson v. Dave Davey, et al
as 22-15391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden, Warden, CSP-Corcoran, C. MUNOZ, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, A. V. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer and others
Raymond Bradford v. J. Ceballos, et al
as 21-15973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CEBALLOS, Appeals Coordinator, C. MUNOZ, Correctional Lieutenant and D. GOREE, Jr., Appeals Coordinator
Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC v. Munoz et al
as 3:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank, Internal Revenue Service, County of San Diego Department of Child Support Services and others
Plaintiff:
Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ij
(PC) Bradford v. Ceballos et al
as 1:2020cv01821
Defendant:
D. Goree, Jr, J. Ceballos and C. Munoz
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Valdez-Perner et al
as 3:2020cv04801
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, K. Royal, C. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branlett Eugene Kimmons v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2019cv00561
Defendant:
C. Munoz, T. Ellis, Dean Borders and others
Plaintiff:
Branlett Eugene Kimmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Bradford v. Superior Court of King County
as 20-73685
Respondent:
SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY
Petitioner:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Not Classified By Court:
C. MUNOZ and In re: RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
(PC) Howell v. Do Canto et al
as 1:2019cv00854
Defendant:
M. Mason, C. Munoz and M. Do Canto
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harris v. Parks et al
as 1:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Hackworth, A. Madrigal, C. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Camargo et al
as 1:2019cv00266
Defendant:
D. Saucedo, C. Munoz, E. Cerda and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
