Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Gosney v. Kinnunen et al
as 6:2026cv02464
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, C. Ruby, Thomas McLay and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen Gosney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. KBC Management Inc.
as 3:2026cv01301
Plaintiff:
Ruby Noble
Defendant:
KBC Management Inc. an Oregon corporation doing business as Holladay Court Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Mileham v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2026cv00445
Plaintiff:
Forge D. Mileham, Jr.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Michael Reese, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones-Miranda v. Legore et al
as 2:2025cv01482
Plaintiff:
Sintorri Lesane Quinones-Miranda
Defendant:
Ryan Legore, Ruby Gardner and Stephen Trott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sidney V. Newton
Defendant:
Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Warren v. Yamhill County et al
as 3:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Renee Warren
Defendant:
Yamhill County, Tim Svenson, Michael Petrasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bailey et al v. Evergreen Estates MHC, LLC
as 3:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Gerald Bailey and Ruby Bailey
Defendant:
Evergreen Estates MHC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kay v. Ruby et al
as 3:2021cv00715
Defendant:
Jeremy Ruby and Richard Geist
Plaintiff:
Kevin Frank Hanson Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
