Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wright v. Singh et al
as 1:2026cv04553
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mark Wright
Defendant:
Harpinder Singh and Fulger Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Brewton v. U.S. et al
as 8:2026cv03071
Petitioner:
Craig Ninja Antonio Brewton
Respondent:
U.S., South Carolina, Chuck Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ho v. Widmar et al
as 1:2026cv04555
Plaintiff:
Manh Ho
Defendant:
Mark R. Widmar, Alexander R. Bradley, Michael J. Ahearn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Veltkamp v. VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv12566
Plaintiff:
Shane Veltkamp
Defendant:
VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC, County of Newaygo, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2026cv07753
Plaintiff:
Hassan Wright
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. doing business as Uber Eats
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02281
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CLIFF et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2026cv02620
Plaintiff:
STACY CLIFF, CHRISTOPHER SUTER, DIXIE SUTER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Wright v. Collins
as 26-2067
Claimant:
RODNEY WRIGHT
Respondent:
DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
