Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Rivera v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv02597
Defendant:
The City of New York and C.O. John Does 1 - 8
Plaintiff:
Damian Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Soto v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01329
Defendant:
City of New York, C.O. John Does 1-4, Police Officer Hailyn Olivares and others
Plaintiff:
Marisol Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilliam v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06416
Defendant:
P.O. Borden, C.O. John Does #1-5, P.O. Michael Donoghue and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Gilliam, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hirsch v. County of Monroe
as 12-3822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas J. Hirsch
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Monroe, City of Rochester, Rochester City Court, Rochester Police Department, State of New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dor v. Olivo et al
as 1:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Claudel Dor
Defendant:
John Olivo and C.O. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03514
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Maldonado
Defendant:
The City of New York, Richard Alvarez, Guillermo Gil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2010cv05035
Defendant:
C.O. Allen, Department of Correction, Deputy Glenn and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willer v. C.O. John Doe et al
as 1:2009cv09214
Plaintiff:
Nico Willer
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv08255
Plaintiff:
Anthony McDonald
Defendant:
The City of New York, Supervisor C.O. John Doe #1, Supervisor C.O. John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
