Cases 41 - 50 of 803
JOHNSON v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2017cv08680
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv06462
Plaintiff:
WILLIE STOKES, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv05175
Plaintiff:
DEBRA L ROGERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv04845
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAY ROGERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLS v. CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2017cv04445
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WALLS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAND v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv03649
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. LAND
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ERIC TAYLOR, FRANK LOBERTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYCKOFF v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv03537
Plaintiff:
KASHIFE H. WYCKOFF
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ERIC TAYLOR, FRANK LOBERTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. COHEN et al
as 1:2017cv03436
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
COHEN, TAYLOR and CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2017cv03248
Plaintiff:
DONALD TERENCE JAMES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv03105
Plaintiff:
PAUL LAWSON, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ERIC TAYLOR, FRANK LOBERTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
