Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SERRANO et al v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
as 1:2024cv04660
Plaintiff:
MONIC SERRANO and DEBRA SHAW
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Monic Serrano et al v. Campbell Soup Company
as 2:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Monic Serrano and Debra Shaw
Defendant:
Campbell Soup Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Henry v. Campbell Soup Company
as 1:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Henry
Defendant:
Campbell Soup Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HANNA v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv12842
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN HANNA
Defendant:
PLUM, PBC and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv08567
Plaintiff:
EDWINA SMITH
Defendant:
PLUM, PBC and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
as 1:2015cv08708
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEPPERIDGE FARM INCORPORATED et al v. GARCIA et al
as 1:2015cv03959
Plaintiff:
PEPPERIDGE FARM INCORPORATED and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Defendant:
NESTOR GARCIA and MARTIN'S FAMOUS PASTRY SHOPPE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell Sales Company, et al v. Nicholas Marrama
as 14-2959
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAMPBELL SALES COMPANY and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. MARRAMA
CAMPBELL SALES COMPANY et al v. MARRAMA
as 1:2014cv02665
Plaintiff:
CAMPBELL SALES COMPANY and CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS A. MARRAMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powers v. Campbell Soup Company et al
as 1:2013cv07663
Plaintiff:
Timothy Powers
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
