Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Canon Inc.In re: Canon Inc.
as 24-102
Petitioner:
In re: CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC.
Respondent:
WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC, dba Brazos Licensing and Development
Canon Inc.In re: Canon Inc.
as 23-141
Petitioner:
In re: CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC.
Respondent:
WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC, dba Brazos Licensing and Development
CANON, INC. et al v. NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv02286
Petitioner:
CANON, INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC.
Respondent:
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, KRISHNA BALACHANDRAN, KUMUD K SANWAL and others
Canon Inc.In re: Canon Inc.
as 22-130
Petitioner:
In re: CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC.
Respondent:
WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC, dba Brazos Licensing and Development and NXP USA, INC.
Canon Inc.In re: Canon Inc.
as 22-131
Petitioner:
In re: CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC.
Respondent:
WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC, dba Brazos Licensing and Development
Highland Surgical Center LLC v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 4:2021cv02409
Plaintiff:
Highland Surgical Center LLC
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, Albertsons/Randall's Health Plan, BB&T Corporation d/b/a McGriff, Seibels & Williams, Inc. Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.
as 20-1947
Appellee:
GARMIN USA, INC., GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., GOPRO, INC. and others
Appellant:
CELLSPIN SOFT, INC.
IPR2019-00311 et al v. AVIGILON FORTRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2019mc00156
In Re:
IPR2019-00311 and IPR2019-00314
Petitioner:
CANON U.S.A., INC., AXIS COMMUNICATIONS AB and CANON INC.
Respondent:
AVIGILON FORTRESS CORPORATION
Avigilon Fortress Corporation v. Canon Inc.
as 19-2220
Appellee:
AXIS COMMUNICATIONS AB, CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC.
Appellant:
AVIGILON FORTRESS CORPORATION
Avigilon Fortress Corporation v. Canon Inc.
as 19-2221
Appellee:
AXIS COMMUNICATIONS AB, CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC.
Appellant:
AVIGILON FORTRESS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
