Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WHITLOW v. DOES et al
as 3:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ALLEN WHITLOW
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, JOHN LAYCOOK, SHARI MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sophias Cure Inc. v. Avexis, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00865
Plaintiff:
Sophias Cure Inc.
Defendant:
Avexis, Inc. , Nationwide Children's Hospital , Nationwide Children's Hospital Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation distri, et al
as 09-17723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA TROUT, BAYKEEPER & IT'S DELTAKEEPER CHAPTER and others
Plaintiff:
METROPLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff in Related Case
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, SAM D. HAMILTON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MICHAEL J. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDERSON-COTTONWOOD IRRIGATION DISTRICT, PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES, LP, RECLAMATION DISTRICT 1004 and others
Defendant-intervenor:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, NATOMAS CENTRAL MUTUAL WATER COMPANY, PELGER MUTUAL WATER COMPANY and others
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 09-17661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA TROUT, BAYKEEPER & IT'S DELTAKEEPER CHAPTER and others
Plaintiff:
METROPLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff in Related Case
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, SAM D. HAMILTON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MICHAEL J. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 09-17599
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA TROUT, BAYKEEPER & IT'S DELTAKEEPER CHAPTER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, SAM D. HAMILTON, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and MICHAEL J. CONNOR, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Defendant:
ANDERSON-COTTONWOOD IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BEVERLY F. ANDREOTTI, BANTA-CARBONA IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Defendant-intervenor:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Delta Carbona, LP v. U.S. Nonwovens Corp.
as 2:2009cv03205
Plaintiff:
Delta Carbona, LP and Delta Carbona, LP
Defendant:
U.S. Nonwovens Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Powell v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2009cv03438
Plaintiff:
Melinda Powell and Melinda Powell
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Roland C. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POWELL v. MERCK & CO INC et al
as 4:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
MELINDA POWELL and MELINDA POWELL
Defendant:
MERCK & CO INC, ROLAND C HENRY and KELLY RAE CARBONA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Moye et al v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2007cv01468
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Moye, Dorothy J. Moye, Leonard Moye and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shires v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00678
Plaintiff:
William Shires, William Shires, William Shires and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
