Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carl Grimes v. County of San Mateo Superior C
as 20-70692
Petitioner:
CARL ANTHONY GRIMES
Respondent:
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT
Carl Grimes v. Geraldine Ayerdis, et al
as 20-15222
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, GERALDINE AYERDIS, SHAUN HUNT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL ANTHONY GRIMES
Grimes v. Dias et al
as 3:2018cv02173
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
Marta S. Dias, Bonie Miller and Sherie Friedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. San Mateo Human Services Agency et al
as 4:2017cv02218
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
San Mateo Human Services Agency, Michael Sullivan and Karla Stehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grimes v. The City of Brisbane et al
as 3:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
The City of Brisbane, A. Sevilla, L. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Ayerdis et al
as 3:2016cv06870
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
Geraldine Ayerdis , Danielle Mendoza , San Francisco Human Services Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grimes v. San Mateo County Transit District et al
as 3:2012cv06381
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
San Mateo County Transit District, Michael J. Scanlon, Karambir Cheema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. Alameda County Social Services/Children Family Services et al
as 4:2012cv05126
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Grimes
Defendant:
Alameda County Social Services/Children Family Services , Lori A. Cox , Laura Loomis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Grimes et al v. Alameda County Social Services/Children Family Services
as 3:2011cv02977
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Grimes and Angelina/Antonio Grimes
Defendant:
Nathan Hobbs , Kelly Rebro , Hoa On and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
