Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Gonzalez v. U.S. Border Patrol et al
as 4:2019cv01650
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protections, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Border Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesus Hernandez, et al v. Unknown Named Agents, et al
as 12-50301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS C. HERNANDEZ, Individually and as the surviving father of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca and MARIA GUADALUPE GUERE BENTACOUR, Individually and as the surviving mother of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMIRO CORDERO, SCOTT A. LUCK, VICTOR M. MANJARREZ, JR. and others
Jesus Hernandez, et al v. Unknown Named Agent
as 12-50217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS C. HERNANDEZ, Individually and as the surviving father of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca and MARIA GUADALUPE GUERE BENTACOUR, Individually and as the surviving mother of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, JESUS MESA, JR., RAMIRO CORDERO and others
Hernandez et al v. Jesus Mesa, Jr., et al
as 3:2011cv00331
Defendant:
Ramiro Cordero, Scott A Luck, Victor M Manjarrez, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Guadalupe Guereca Bentacour and Jesus C. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
