Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Gipson v. Lake County Sheriffs Department
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Gipson
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson v. Lake County Sheriffs Department
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Gipson
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEJIA-QUINTANILLA v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
CARLOS MEJIA-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WALLACE v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
CARLOS WALLACE
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORTIZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00052
Petitioner:
CARLOS ORTIZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KIDD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2022cv00531
Petitioner:
CARLOS RAY KIDD
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CRUZ-RIVERA v. USA
as 1:2022cv01936
Petitioner:
ROBERTO CARLOS CRUZ RIVERA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Lott et al
as 3:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
A Lott, Jamie Eguia, Carlos Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENTON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, THE
as 2:2022cv00204
Petitioner:
CARLOS K. DENTON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
