Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jones-Bey v. Stanislov et al
as 1:2023cv05599
Plaintiff:
Sister E Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Skarbo Stanislov, Carlos De La Rosa and Samer Nasser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bayon v. USA
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veerji Exports v. Carlos St Mary, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03661
Plaintiff:
Veerji Exports
Defendant:
Carlos St Mary, Inc., Carlos St Mary and Brink's Global Services USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ebanks v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
Errol Ebanks
Defendant:
Gustavo Ruiz, Carlos Rivera and Stream Auto Outlet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Vitucci et al v. Radparvar et al
as 1:2021cv06657
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Wayne Vitucci
Defendant:
The Estate of Jerry Vitucci, Donika Mejtoja, Hooshmand Radparvar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlo v. Strides Pharma, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03372
Defendant:
Strides Pharma, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aida Carlo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Bloom et al v. Emden et al
as 1:2019cv10155
Plaintiff:
Fiduciary Trust Company International and Susan F. Bloom
Defendant:
Nicholas Marcelo Emden, Juan Carlos Emden and Miguel Eric Emden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Giurdanella v. New York City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv05455
Defendant:
State of New York, New York City Police Dept. and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Carlo Giurdanella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
In re Lifetrade Litigation
as 1:2017cv02987
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramiro Aviles, Gullermo Benelli, Alejandro Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Guerrero-Roa v. Westlake Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00817
Defendant:
Carsbuck, Inc. and Westlake Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Carlos Guerrero-Roa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
