Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Carlson v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Paige M. Carlson
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carlson v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horn v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv03633
Plaintiff:
Riley Ernest Horn
Defendant:
State of Maryland, John C. Wobensmith, District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv02816
Plaintiff:
Jordan Matthew Grant
Defendant:
State of Maryland, John C. Wobensmith, District Court of Maryland for Montgomery County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henson v. McLaughlin et al
as 1:2017cv01665
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
Beverly McLaughlin, Krista Swan-Bilak, Barrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perin et al v. Sierra Land Group, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Vanice A Perin and Donald E Carlson
Defendant:
Sierra Land Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 8:2015cv03836
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
KBR Inc, Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, Halliburton Company and others
Receiver:
Jimmy Dwayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibbs v. Carlson et al
as 8:2015cv02653
Plaintiff:
Maggie Gibbs
Defendant:
Christopher R. Carlson and State Farm Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hendricks v. Sutbaus et al
as 1:2015cv01541
Plaintiff:
Ray Love Hendricks
Defendant:
Austin Sutbaus and Erick Carlson, CEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manekin Construction LLC v. Window Specialists, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
Manekin Construction LLC
Defendant:
Window Specialists, Inc. and Robert J Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
