Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sitivong v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Manichanh Sitivong
Defendant:
United States of America and Jae Carlton Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wood Bro Capital, LLC v. Underwood et al
as 3:2016cv00405
Defendant:
Dwight R Carlton, Duane R South, Genevieve A South and others
Plaintiff:
Wood Bro Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00325
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Paul Patrick Jolivette, Jr., et al v People of the State of California, et al
as 2:2013cv02322
Respondent:
Attorney General, Stephen Carlton, John C. Fitton and others
Petitioner:
Paul Patrick Jolivette, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams et al v. Compass Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Melloian, Jr., Robert L Lowe, Janice Lucas and others
Defendant:
Compass USA SPE, LLC, Compass USA GP, LLC, SMOF A, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Trustee John L. Andersen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Independent American Party of Nevada et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2010cv01477
Plaintiff:
Gale Carlton, Tony Dane, Christopher Hansen and others
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carlton et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2008cv01225
Plaintiff:
Richard Dana Carlton and Mary Kay Carlton
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Linda Hite, Patricia Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gardner v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2008cv00510
Plaintiff:
Carlton Gardner
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
