Cases 1 - 10 of 19
CAMACHO v. BEERS et al
as 2:2016cv01644
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CAMACHO, JR.
Defendant:
BEERS, L. JOHNSON, BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. WOODS
Defendant:
MARK CAPOZZA, STEPHANIE WOOD, CAROL SCIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RIECO v. BAUCHER et al
as 2:2015cv01510
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
ROY BAUCHER, LITHGOW, KENNETH PEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MU'MIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
HAMID A. MU'MIN
Defendant:
MARK CAPOZZA, CAROL SCIRE, TAMMIE HOOKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYON v. CAPPOZZA et al
as 2:2014cv01203
Plaintiff:
MICKY MAYON
Defendant:
MARK CAPPOZZA, ROCHELLE KING, COLIN FISCHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIECO v. MORAN et al
as 2:2014cv00588
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MORAN, SMITH, GUSKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIECO et al v. SCIRE et al
as 2:2013cv01360
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO and HERIBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CAROL SCIRE and CAPPOZZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODWINE v. KELLER et al
as 2:2009cv01592
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODWINE, JR.
Defendant:
KELLER, BENJAMIN A. MARTINEZ, CHARLES FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CULLEN et al v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2009cv01562
Plaintiff:
JOHN CULLEN, MICHAEL PERRY, CARL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY BEARD, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
