Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Cindy Johnson, et al v. Arizona Hospital and Health.
as 09-80142
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
BARBARA A. CRAIG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CINDY M. JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and STEPHANIE L. WALKER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATION, BANNER HEALTH, SUN HEALTH CORPORATION and others
Pepping v. Carondelet Health Network
as 4:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pepping
Defendant:
Carondelet Health Network
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jane Doe v. Federal District Court, et al
as 08-16942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT, OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roe v. Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, et al
as 2:2007cv01293
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Roe and Rhonda Roe
Defendant:
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, AzHHA Service Corporation, Banner Health and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Doe v. Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, et al
as 2:2007cv01292
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Jane Doe, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, AzHHA Service Corporation, Banner Health and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Doe v. Federal District Court et al
as 4:2007cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Federal District Court, United States Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
