Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Juarez v. Bouazzaoui et al
as 3:2022cv02681
Plaintiff:
Claudia Juarez
Defendant:
Choukri Bouazzaoui and Carrol Fulmer Logistics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
San Martin v. Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv02596
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Murrillo San Martin
Defendant:
Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation and Kyle Bosshart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Crechale v. Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00617
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation and David L. Brooks
Plaintiff:
Philip Crechale and Phillip Crechale
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Kenneth John Crechale and Michael Crechale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Handy v. Daniel Loval et al
as 6:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Charles Handy
Defendant:
Sir Carter Daniel Loval and Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Old Republic Life Insurance v. Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
Old Republic Life Insurance
Defendant:
Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation and Anthony Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mahaffey v. Bacon et al
as 3:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mark Mahaffey
Defendant:
William Bacon , Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James et al v. Owens et al
as 2:2011cv00523
Defendant:
Charles Owens , Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation and State National Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Morris James and Quandisha L Michael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMX Environmental Evolution Ltd v. Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation
as 3:2008cv00908
Plaintiff:
AMX Environmental Evolution Ltd
Defendant:
Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation and Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
