Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cerner Middle East Limited v. iCapital, LLC, et al
as 17-35514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CERNER MIDDLE EAST LIMITED, a Cayman Islands Exempted Company
Defendant - Appellee:
ICAPITAL, LLC, a U.A.E. limited liability company and AHMED SAEED MAHOUD AL-BADI AL-DAHARI
Cerner Middle East Limited v. Belbadi Enterprises LLC, et al
as 17-35157
Defendant / Appellee:
VANDEVCO LIMITED, a Washington corporation and BELBADI ENTERPRISES LLC, a U.A.E. limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CERNER MIDDLE EAST LIMITED, a Cayman Islands Exempted Company
Cerner Middle East Limited v. Belbadi Enterprises LLC, et al
as 17-35157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CERNER MIDDLE EAST LIMITED, a Cayman Islands Exempted Company
Defendant - Appellee:
BELBADI ENTERPRISES LLC, a U.A.E. limited liability company and VANDEVCO LIMITED, a Washington corporation
Cerner Middle East Limited v. iCapital, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00954
Plaintiff:
Cerner Middle East Limited
Defendant:
iCapital, LLC and Ahmed Saeed Mahmoud Al-Badie Al-Dahari
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205
Cerner Middle East Limited v. Belbadi Enterprises LLC et al
as 3:2016cv05706
Plaintiff:
Cerner Middle East Limited
Defendant:
Belbadi Enterprises LLC and Vandevco Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cerner Middle East Limited v. iCapital, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01631
Defendant:
Ahmed Saeed Mahoud Al-Badie Al-Dahari and iCapital, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cerner Middle East Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cerner Middle East Limited v. Belbadi Enterprises, LLC
as 3:2016cv01630
Defendant:
Belbadi Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cerner Middle East Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
CERNER MIDDLE EAST LIMITED v. ICAPITAL LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
CERNER MIDDLE EAST LIMITED
Defendant:
ICAPITAL LLC and AHMED SAEED MAHMOUD AL-BADIE AL-DAHARI
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0202
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
