Cases 1 - 10 of 201
First Montana Bank, Inc. v. BBNDD, LLC, et al
as 9:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
First Montana Bank, Inc.
Defendant:
BBNDD, LLC,, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Uber Technologies, Inc. et al v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 doing business as Principia Underwriters and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400588 doing business as Aspen Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Monarch Title Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No. SUANESB10204-2103 et al
as 2:2023cv10867
Plaintiff:
MONARCH TITLE COMPANY
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. SUANESB10204-2103, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. SUA6191-2203, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No. SUANESB10204 2103 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Columbia Casualty Company et al
as 3:2023cv02157
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant:
Columbia Casualty Company and Admiral Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Spokeo, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. CT1006920
as 2:2023cv09260
Plaintiff:
Spokeo, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Spokeo, Inc.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy. No. CT1006920, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. CT1006920 and Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
City of Seattle v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No PK1027719
as 2:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
City of Seattle
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. PK1027719 and Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No PK1027719
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Amyn, Inc. v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv07924
Plaintiff:
Amyn, Inc. dba Jewelry on 7th and Amyn, Inc. doing business as Jewelry on 7th
Defendant:
StarStone Specialty Insurance Company, Does 1 through 30, inclusive and Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London Subscribing To Policy No. Ss0002319/0010.o
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Powers et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London as subscribed to Policy Number MPL4147217.19 et al
as 2:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Brittany Powers and American Protection Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London as subscribed to Policy Number MPL4147217.19, Hiscox, Inc., Hiscox, Inc. doing business as Hiscox Insurance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Security National Ins. Co. v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Security National Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Ironshore Indemnity, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
A-1 Hawk, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. FINFR2002888, Including Members of Ascot Syndicate 1414
as 3:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
A-1 Hawk, Inc.
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. FINFR2002888, INCLUDING MEMBERS OF ASCOT SYNDICATGE 1414 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. FINFR2002888, Including Members of Ascot Syndicate 1414
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
