Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jerico Cruz v. Capital Fitness, Inc., et al
as 23-1706
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERICO MATIAS CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPITAL FITNESS, INC., CFI SERIES, LLC, KELLY CARTWRIGHT and others
Cruz v. Capital Fitness, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jerico Matias Cruz
Defendant:
Capital Fitness, Inc., CFI Series, LLC, Kelly Cartwright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
CFI DEDICATED, INC. D/B/A TRANSPORT AMERICA v. VICTORY INNOVATIONS COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01546
Plaintiff:
CFI DEDICATED, INC. D/B/A TRANSPORT AMERICA
Defendant:
VICTORY INNOVATIONS COMPANY, INC. and JCM TRINITY HOLDINGS INC. D/B/A ENVIRO-MASTER OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CFI DESIGN MANAGEMENT, INC. v. CHOSEN COMMERCIAL CONTRACT, INC.
as 1:2018cv02878
Defendant:
CHOSEN COMMERCIAL CONTRACT, INC.
Plaintiff:
CFI DESIGN MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worden Martin v. CFI Design Management et al
as 2:2016cv02136
Plaintiff:
Worden Martin Inc
Defendant:
CFI Design Management Inc and Steven Brent Wampler
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 et al v. CFI, Inc.
as 1:2009cv07376
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597, Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597, Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 and others
Defendant:
CFI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Fioretti et al v. CFI Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03348
Plaintiff:
Gary Fioretti and Michelle M. Fioretti
Defendant:
CFI Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Fioretti et al v. CFI Mortgage Inc et al
as 1:2007mc00003
Plaintiff:
Gary Fioretti, Gary Fioretti, Gary Fioretti and others
Defendant:
CFI Mortgage Inc and Stephen Williams
Receiver:
Martin Goldberg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
