Cases 1 - 10 of 10
James Riffin v. New Freedom Borough, et al
as 23-1048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW FREEDOM BOROUGH, ANN SHEMO, DENNIS SARPEN and others
James Riffin v. New Freedom Borough, et al
as 22-8004
Petitioner:
JAMES RIFFIN
Respondent:
CGA LAW FIRM, FRANKLIN LAND DEVELOPMENT LP, FRANKLIN SQUARE VENTURES LLC and others
Riffin v. New Freedom Borough et al
as 1:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
James Riffin
Defendant:
Anne Shemo, Franklin Square Ventures, LLC, Dennis Sarpen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02078
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hrobuchak v. Transcontinental Refrigerated Lines, Inc., by Lawrence V. Young, Liquidating Agent et al
as 1:2017cv02173
Plaintiff:
Janis Hrobuchak
Defendant:
Transcontinental Refrigerated Lines, Inc., by Lawrence V. Young, Liquidating Agent , Rees Griffiths , Eric Suter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Fortunato et al v. CGA Law Firm et al
as 1:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Fortunato , Elizabeth Fortunato and Alexander Fortunato
Defendant:
CGA Law Firm and Margaret Driscoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandeep Nayak v. Anne Zerbe, et al
as 16-4446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDEEP NAYAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNE E. ZERBE, CGA LAW FIRM, MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC and others
Nayak v. McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00933
Plaintiff:
Sandeep Nayak
Defendant:
McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC , Brian F. Jackson , Anne E. Zerbe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandeep Nayak v. CGA Law Firm, et al
as 14-2783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDEEP NAYAK
Defendant - Appellee:
CGA LAW FIRM, ANNE E. ZERBE and ZACHARY E. NAHASS
Sandeep Nayak v. CGA Law Firm, et al
as 14-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDEEP NAYAK
Defendant - Appellee:
CGA LAW FIRM, ANNE E. ZERBE and ZACHARY E. NAHASS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
