Cases 1 - 9 of 9
White v. Summit Energy Services, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Charles R White, Jr
Defendant:
Summit Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Charles N. White Construction Company v. Great American Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv03156
Plaintiff:
Charles N. White Construction Company
Defendant:
Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leal v. Magic Auto Touch Up Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Sergio Leal
Defendant:
Magic Auto Touch Up Inc, Magic Touch Up Inc, Charles R White, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
White v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03352
Plaintiff:
Charles A White
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres-Rocha v. Magic Auto Touch Up Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01154
Plaintiff:
Jose Leobardo Torres-Rocha
Defendant:
Magic Auto Touch Up Inc, Charles R White, Jr and James B White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
White et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2010cv02528
Defendant:
Dallas County, Dallas County Hospital District, Arif M Khan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. White and Sandra E. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. white et al
as 1:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Charles E. White, Douglas L. White, Curtis White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
T&C Leasing, Inc. v. Hottie Body Tanning I, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00648
Plaintiff:
T&C Leasing, Inc.
Defendant:
Hottie Body Tanning I, LLC, Hottie Body Tanning II, LLC, Hottie Body Tanning III, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
