Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marvin Harris, et al v. Charles Marshall, et al
as 17-17372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN HARRIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES D. MARSHALL, Warden, T. J. STEELE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director Department of Corrections and others
Robert Henry v. Charles Marshall
as 12-70618
Petitioner:
ROBERT HENRY
Respondent:
CHARLES D. MARSHALL, Warden
Robert Griffin v. James Gomez, et al
as 11-15373
Petitioner - Appellee:
ROBERT LEE GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellant:
JAMES GOMEZ, Director of California Department of Corrections, C. A. TERHUNE, Director, CHARLES D. MARSHALL and others
Robert Henry v. Charles Marshall
as 10-17206
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT HENRY
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES D. MARSHALL
Madrid, et al v. Dept Of Corrections, et al
as 3:1990cv03094
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Madrid , Ronnie Dewberry, Carlos Lutz and others
Defendant:
James Rowland, Charles D. Marshall, T. K. Boyll and others
Intervenor:
Gregory Eugene Shock and California Correctional Peace Officers Association
Amicu:
Amici Curiae
Pecial_master:
John Hagar
3rd_party_defendant:
Paul M. Starkey
Miscellaneou:
Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Griffin v. James Gomez, et al
as 09-16744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT LEE GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES GOMEZ, Director of California Department of Corrections, CHARLES D. MARSHALL, C. A. TERHUNE, Director and others
Wilson v. Dist Atty's Office, et al
as 3:1992cv03181
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Wilson
Defendant:
District Attorneys' Office, D. Lowell Jensen, J. P. Vukasin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Gomez, et al
as 5:1998cv21038
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Griffin
Defendant:
James Gomez , Charles D. Marshall , C.A. Terhune and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mathis, et al v. Marshall
as 5:1991cv20050
Defendant:
Charles D. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Benjamin S. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
