Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Lewis v. United States Justice Department et al
as 5:2014cv00635
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Lewis
Defendant:
United States Justice Department, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCC Coleman - USP II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Lockett et al
as 5:2014cv00563
Plaintiff:
Marcus Leanders Bailey
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, FNU Ndife, Michael Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FOWLER v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2014cv00297
Defendant:
CRAIG COIL, J. CHARLES LOCKETT and THOMAS WEBSTER
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Booker v. Cintron et al
as 5:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
Joseph Booker
Defendant:
Miguel Cintron, Alex Seda, Crystal Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOON v. LOCKETT, et al.
as 2:2014cv00068
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00067
Defendant:
R. BASKERVILLE, BEAVER, J. BEIGHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. JOYNER et al
as 1:2013cv02012
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT
as 1:2013cv02010
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nosair v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
El-Sayyid Nosair
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Leslie Smith, D Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Defendant:
CRAIG APKER, BRACE, DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
