Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Wake et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
N. Wake, Tim Garret and K. Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Smith v. Fred Foulk
as 14-16089
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES R. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
FRED FOULK, Warden
Smith et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 3:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith and Patricia R. Smith
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Foulk
as 2:2014cv00529
Petitioner:
Charles R. Smith
Respondent:
Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Foulk
as 2:2013cv02387
Petitioner:
Charles R Smith
Respondent:
Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles R Smith v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2013cv07528
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Charles R Smith
William Jamison, et al v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd'
as 12-17412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMISON, GEORGE SULLIVAN, JOAN ADELE SULLIVAN, husband and wife and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO. B0146LDUSA0701030
Jamison et al v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Under Policy No.B0146LDUSA0701030
as 3:2011cv04958
Plaintiff:
William Jamison , George Sullivan , Joan Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Under Policy No.B0146LDUSA0701030
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Small Business Administration v. Propper et al
as 3:2009mc00504
Defendant:
Richard D. Propper, Acorn Connecticut Investments, L.P., Kerry S Propper and others
Receiver:
U.S. Small Business Administration
Plaintiff:
Acorn Technology Fund, L.P.
United States Small Business Administration v. Propper et al
as 2:2009mc00068
Plaintiff:
United States Small Business Administration
Defendant:
Richard D. Propper, Acorn Connecticut Investments, L.P., Kerry S. Propper and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
