Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Uptergrove v. Youngblood
as 1:2013cv01664
Petitioner:
Charles Wayne Uptergrove
Respondent:
Donny Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Uptergrove
as 1:2010at00656
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Wayne Uptergrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Uptergrove
as 1:2010cv01598
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Wayne Uptergrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MILLER et al v. FEDERAL RESERVE et al
as 1:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. MILLER, RANDALL LYNN HARPER, KENNETH JOHN MALINOWSKI and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE, ERIC S. ROSENGREN, WILLIAM C. DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Charles Uptergrove, et al
as 08-17668
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES WAYNE UPTERGROVE and MARTHA GENE UPTERGROVE
Defendant:
HOMEQ SERVICING CORP., STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT and COPELAND LUMBER COMPANY
Uptergrove et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv01800
Plaintiff:
Charles Wayne Uptergrove and Martha Gene Uptergrove
Defendant:
United States of America, McGregor Scott, G. Patrick Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Uptergrove v. USDC-CEF
as 08-74738
:
In re: CHARLES WAYNE UPTERGROVE
Petitioner:
CHARLES WAYNE UPTERGROVE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Uptergrove v. USA, et al
as 08-16887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WAYNE UPTERGROVE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DARRIN LAMBERT, G PATRICK JENNINGS and others
Uptergrove v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2008cv00303
Defendant:
United States of America, Darrin Lambert, G Patrick Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Wayne Uptergrove
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
