Cases 1 - 10 of 38
PRATER et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMP. et al
as 2:2020cv01200
Defendant:
GREGORY MILLS, DANA MILLS, MIDAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER, "JOHN DOE" DECEASED, "JANE DOE" MINOR CHILD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION et al v. PRATER et al
as 2:2020cv01035
Defendant:
CHIDIADI D EZENGWA, CHARMAINE PRATER and JUAN REYES
Plaintiff:
BBS and PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00074
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR S. DOUGHERTY, CARLEEN WYTCHE, ANTHONY DISABATO and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. AMERICAN HERITAGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2018cv05515
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MATTHEW JAMES, JOH DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
PRATER v. FRYE et al
as 2:2018cv01774
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
FRYE, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRATER v. GROSSMAN et al
as 2:2018cv01526
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
CHARLES R. GROSSMAN, SR., JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. COLON
as 2:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
CHARMAINE PRATER COLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILA HOUSING AUTHORITY v. PRATER et al
as 2:2017cv04312
Plaintiff:
PHILA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Defendant:
ELLA PRATER, ESTATE OF ELLA PRATER, CHARMAINE PRATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. EXCEL HOME CARE et al
as 2:2017cv04044
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
EXCEL HOME CARE, "JOHN DOE" - LEGENDARY, "JANE DOE" - GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2017cv03203
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, CITY OF PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION COMMISSIONER, JOHN MANDROS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
