Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HOWARD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
LEON J. HOWARD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMIE SORBER, SCI-PHOENIX EX-SUPERINTENDENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. PRESIDENT OF THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2022cv01371
Plaintiff:
JAMES D EVANS
Defendant:
PRESIDENT OF THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, CHIEF HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATOR FOR THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spellman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Spellman
Defendant:
John Doe, Chief Grievance Office, GTL Incorporate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Kelly Bey v. William Bechtold, et al
as 20-3060
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. KNEAL, Prime Care Medical Inc., D.D.S., JUSTIN H. LENSBOWER, Chief Health Care Administrator, WILLIAM BECHTOLD, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID F. KELLY BEY
In re: Alton D. Brown
as 16-1546
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, DANIEL BURNS, TIMOTHY S. RINGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE and C.O. FRANK
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAUN R. SANCHEZ
Aaron Jones v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-4477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON T. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Superintendent, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, EDWARD BOHNA, School Principal and others
Aaron Jones v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-3985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON T. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Superintendent, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, EDWARD BOHNA, School Principal and others
James Evans v. Superintendent, et al
as 08-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT, GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent, JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
