Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Council for Medicare Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Council for Medicare Choice, Fort Worth Association of Health Underwriters, Inc. and Vogue Insurance Agency LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Americans for Beneficiary Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Americans for Beneficiary Choice and Senior Security Benefits, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Roesel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Phillip Roesel
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Inc., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Verda Health Plan of Texas, Inc. v. Becerra et al
as 4:2023cv02896
Plaintiff:
Verda Health Plan of Texas, Inc.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Chiquita Brooks-Lasure
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
National Infusion Center Association et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
National Infusion Center Association, Global Colon Cancer Association and Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Texas et al v. Brooks-LaSure et al
as 6:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Defendant:
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Elite Medical Laboratory Solutions, LLC et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Elite Medical Laboratory Solutions, LLC doing business as Diax Labs, Graham Tomball LLC doing business as Diax Labs and Elite Medical Laboratory Solutions LLC doing business as Diax Labs
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and Novitas Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA,, United States Department of Health and Human Services, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE and others
Petitioner:
Representative Chip Roy
Amicus Curiae:
Representative Michael Burgess, Representative Dan Crenshaw, Representative Jake Ellzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
