Cases 21 - 27 of 27
JAYE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2016cv07771
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
MELFI , MICHAEL SHIPP, MICHAEL FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chris Jaye v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 16-2641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IONE K. CURVA, in her Official Capacity, THE HON. PETER A. BUCHSBAUM, individually and in his Official Capacity as Judge of the Law Division of Hunterdon County and others
Chris Jaye v. Oak Knoll Village Condominium, et al
as 16-2515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant - Appellee:
OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOC INC, STEPHENSON & ASSOCIATES, its agents and assigns, MAINTENANCE SOLUTIONS INC., its agents and assigns and others
JAYE v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08324
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. , ERICK P. SPRONCK , ROBERT A. STEPHENSON and others
Cross_claimant:
CLINTON TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY , FOX CHASE CONTRACTING, LLC and FREY ENGINEERING
Cross_defendant:
CLINTON TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY , ACCESS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT , EDWARD BERMAN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JAYE v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv08324
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ERICK P. SPRONCK, ROBERT A. STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JAYE v. NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN HOFFMAN et al
as 3:2014cv07471
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN HOFFMAN, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL lONE CURVA, THE HON. PETER BUCHSBAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
