Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Sanders v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08141
Plaintiff:
Christian Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Medical Services and Correctional Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honicky v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv02323
Plaintiff:
Mark Christian Honicky
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01924
Petitioner:
Christian Lee Sanders
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanchez v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00746
Petitioner:
Christian Alberto Sanchez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03583
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Andres Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03211
Plaintiff:
Christian Hopkins
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darwin-Vargas v. USA
as 4:2016cv00378
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Darwin-Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis #195873 v. Unknown Parties, et al.
as 2:2016cv02019
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Donald Spectre, Steven P Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hale v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
Kilian Hale
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Joseph M Arpaio , Nicholas Contino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas #233382 v. Colorado River Behavioral Health Systems et al
as 2:2015cv01754
Plaintiff:
Christian Ronnell Thomas
Defendant:
Colorado River Behavioral Health Systems, Transitional Living Center and Ronda Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
