Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magellan Technology, Inc. et al v. Dorbes LLC. et al
as 7:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Magellan Technology, Inc. and Ecto World, LLC. doing business as Demand Vape
Defendant:
Dorbes LLC. and Christian A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Christian v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Zane Christian
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC. v. Ateto et al
as 7:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC.
Defendant:
Philip Ateto, Barkha Bhandari, Joel Davis and others
Nealson v. Meadows
as 7:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Christian T. Nealson
Defendant:
Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Reynolds, S.K. Coleman, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Owens et al
as 7:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Owens, J. Harrison, M. Posaik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Stone et al
as 7:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Sgt. Stone, C/O Stacey, C/O Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Maynard et al
as 7:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Mr. Maynard, Mr. Ball, Mr. Cassey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
