Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Soto v. Edelen
as 5:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Matteo Manuel Soto
Defendant:
Christopher Edelen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Brevard County)
as 6:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Jerome M. Allen
Defendant:
Mark S Inch, Ashley B. Moody and Christopher Edelen
Petitioner:
Jerome (NMN) Allen
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodney Mountjoy v. Christopher Edelene
as 21-11614
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EDELENE, Colonel
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY C. MOUNTJOY
Coleman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv21717
Defendant:
J. Dawson, J-Pay Corporation, Warden D. Snider and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIGSBY v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2020cv00504
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, CHRISTOPHER EDELEN and TEDDER
Plaintiff:
XAVIER URIAH RIGSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIGSBY v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2020cv00452
Plaintiff:
XAVIER U RIGSBY
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, CHRISTOPHER EDELEN and UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODY v. EDELEN et al
as 3:2020cv05572
Defendant:
BRYANT GOODWIN, HARTSHARGER, CHRISTOPHER EDELEN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD MOODY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODY v. EDELEN et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
MR KING, BRYANT GOODWIN and CHRISTOPHER EDELEN
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD MOODY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. EDELEN et al
as 4:2020cv00228
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER EDELEN, S MAYNARD and A THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
