Cases 51 - 60 of 73
OTERO v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOSE OTERO
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEACH v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05071
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEACH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER HULMES and DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05072
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DYSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHRISTOPHER HULMES and DOE 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv04982
Plaintiff:
GARY WILSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHRISTOPHER HULMES , BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYALA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv04981
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO AYALA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02744
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY GROSE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER HULMES and LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROEBUCK v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv01930
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROEBUCK
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT , WALTER BARTLE , NATHAN RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRASCO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01809
Plaintiff:
CRISTINA E. CARRASCO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01155
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LAVERY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. HULMES et al
as 2:2017cv00805
Plaintiff:
FELDON BUSH
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
