Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Jackson v. Alteryx, Inc.
as 3:2017cv02021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Alteryx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
USA v. Christopher Jackson
as 14-10441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JACKSON
Jackson v. Maes et al
as 3:2014cv03167
Plaintiff:
Ira Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Steve Maes, Leo Bondad and Paul Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Jackson v. Los Angeles Police Department Pacific Division et al
as 2:2013cv01595
Defendant:
Thomas Corte, ERA Matilla Realty, Thomas Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Jackson v. Walker et al
as 2:2011cv03167
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
J. Walker, Hague, Haythorne and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Jackson v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 2:2010cv01627
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Video Enhancement Solutions, L.L.C. v. Denon Electronics (USA), L.L.C. et al
as 2:2010cv04370
Counter Defendant:
Acacia Patent Acquisition LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Video Enhancement Solutions, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Creative Labs, Inc., Denon Electronics (USA), L.L.C., Epson America, Inc. and others
Unknown:
Lisa R Strauss, Edward Alexander Marshall, Richard A Mitchell and others
Interested Party:
DIVX, Inc., Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, MPEG LA, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Epson America, Inc., Funai Corporation, Onkyo U.S.A. Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Video Enhancement Solutions, L.L.C.
Cleaveland v. Jackson et al
as 3:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Cleaveland
Defendant:
Roy Jackson, Christopher Jackson, Miracle Electric Co. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
