Cases 1 - 10 of 9,303
Mata v. State of Arizona
as 3:2024cv50183
Defendant:
State of Arizona and City of Chandler
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boothe v. City of Northfield, Illinois
as 1:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Scott Boothe
Defendant:
City of Northfield, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClurge v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03914
Plaintiff:
Christopher McClurge
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kacar v. City of Skokie et al
as 1:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
Faruk Kacar
Defendant:
City of Skokie, City Of Chicago and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wilson et al v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2024cv03115
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson and Kmarion Wilson
Defendant:
Derek J Wilkerson, Tim Collier, City of Springfield Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Reuter et al
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Scott Reuter, City of Decatur Illinois, K.G. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
