Cases 1 - 10 of 4,068
Weyerman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Joquette N. Weyerman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
VanAgtmael v. Hart, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Vanagtmael
Defendant:
Hart, City of and Rob Splane
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lee #112795 v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Darrick Devon Lee #112795
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Jake Ellis and Zachary Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Glenn v. Kraszewski et al
as 2:2024cv10665
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Glenn, III
Defendant:
Aaron Kraszewski and Detroit, City of
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11174
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller and The City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
