Cases 1 - 10 of 779
Wilson et al v. Wilkerson et al
as 3:2024cv03115
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson and Kmarion Wilson
Defendant:
Derek J Wilkerson, Tim Collier, City of Springfield Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Reuter et al
as 2:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Scott Reuter, City of Decatur Illinois, K.G. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv03111
Plaintiff:
Nadeja Malone, Stephen Paris, Acelyn Paris and others
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Kevin byrd, Derek Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Coyle v. Harr et al
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Jessica Coyle
Defendant:
Ross Harr, Kyle Cruz and City of Peoria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington Sr. v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Mario Devonne Washington Sr.
Defendant:
Nathan Lewis, Kyle Winbigler, Kevin Legate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Nicholas Doage, Jeff Linden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Poore v. Warden RRM Kansas City
as 1:2024cv01120
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Poore
Respondent:
Warden RRM Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Peoria County et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Hill
Defendant:
Peoria County, Jodi M Hoos, Jason Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Coleman et al
as 1:2024cv01112
Defendant:
Traver Coleman, Harold Gist and City of Virden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Gist et al
as 3:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Traver Coleman
Defendant:
Harold Gist and City of Virden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
