Cases 11 - 20 of 2,873
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Paddington Station, LLC v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Paddington Station, LLC
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., as Trustee, in Trust for the Registered Holders of WAM Asset-Backed Certificates WAMU Series 2007-HE2 Trust and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Genesis Management Resources Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv02559
Plaintiff:
Genesis Management Resources Corp.
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Coaxum v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 8:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Latesha Shante Coaxum
Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Vice President Frank Myers and The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1638 Truth in Lending
Melamed v. Citibank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv02495
Plaintiff:
Andrew Melamed
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
