Cases 51 - 60 of 644
City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 0:2022mc00012
Respondent:
Bank of America Corporation
Petitioner:
The City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor of Baltimore, City Council of Baltimore and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Citigroup Inc. v. Seade
as 1:2021cv10413
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc.
Respondent:
Luis Sebastian Sayeg Seade
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 303
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00605
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
New Mexico State Investment Council
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
New Mexico State Investment Council v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00606
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
New Mexico State Investment Council, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico and New Mexico Educational Retirement Board
In Re:
Credit Default Swaps Auctions Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04893
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
