Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
City of Seattle, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 26-5553
Plaintiff:
CITY OF SEATTLE, CITY OF CLEVELAND, CITY OF COLUMBUS and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOES 1-100 and others
Jennifer Kilnapp v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 26-3718
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER KILNAPP
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH and BAILEY GANNON, in his official and personal capacity
Boyko v. City of Cleveland et al.
as 1:2026cv01859
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Boyko
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Dorothy A. Todd, Dorant A. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Itson v. City of Cleveland Heights et al.
as 1:2026cv01861
Plaintiff:
Kali Itson
Defendant:
City of Cleveland Heights, Wiliam (Bill) R. Hanna, Harrison Lee Crumrine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chabad of University Circle v. City of Cleveland, Ohio et al.
as 1:2026cv01779
Plaintiff:
Chabad of University Circle
Defendant:
City of Cleveland and Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaiah Hunter-Bey v. Edgar Roque, et al
as 26-3682
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH NARAYANA SABIR HUNTER-BEY
Defendant:
EDGAR MANUEL ROQUE, CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH and JOHN/JANE DOES, 1-100, City Officials of Cleveland, Unknown Officials acting under color of law
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
